Share this
Summary
The European Union is preparing new safeguard mechanisms that could significantly restrict rice imports from India, Pakistan, Myanmar, Cambodia, and other Asian exporters. Although these developments come while India and the EU negotiate a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), the proposed tariff-based restrictions raise concerns about protectionism, reduced market access, and shrinking export opportunities for Asian rice suppliers.
Free Trade Agreements Under Pressure from EU Safeguards
Free Trade Agreements are often expected to open markets, but emerging EU decisions suggest the opposite for Asian rice exporters. While India is in advanced stages of negotiating an FTA with the EU, fresh updates from Brussels indicate restrictive measures that could offset potential trade gains.
Last week, the EU Council and Parliament agreed to introduce a “specific automatic safeguard mechanism” for basmati and non-basmati rice. This system, executed through tariff-rate quotas, will activate whenever rice imports exceed historical averages. Once endorsed by the European Council and Parliament, the rule is set to take effect on January 1, 2027.
Safeguard Mechanisms Driven by Lobbying and Protectionism
Safeguard measures are being justified as tools to protect EU growers and rice millers. However, a closer look points to a strong push from the Federation of European Rice Millers (FERM), whose lobbying influence appears central to this policy shift.
Safeguard mechanisms could lead to:
- A shrinking number of suppliers, transforming an open market into a controlled one.
- Restrictions on packaged rice exports from Asia.
- European millers becoming the only major brand sellers within the continent.
Currently, the EU imports over 2 million tonnes of rice, comprising:
- 500,000 tonnes of husked rice
- 600,000 tonnes of broken rice
- 1.2 million tonnes of milled rice
Back in 2004—when the EU opened its rice market via the GATT agreement—imports were just 600,000 tonnes.
Tariffs and Additional Barriers Target Asian Exporters
Tariffs could rise dramatically based on FERM’s demands for stronger protectionism. The proposed tariff increases include:
- Semi-milled and wholly milled rice: €175 → €416 per tonne
- Husked rice: €65 → €264 per tonne
Tariffs are only part of the challenge.
The EU is also exploring restrictions based on alleged human-rights risks and pesticide residues (like tricyclazole)—measures widely viewed as aimed at South Asia.
Markets Face Shrinking Access Despite Growing Demand
Markets in South Asia, especially India and Pakistan, face the greatest impact. Historically, 80–90% of their rice exports to the EU consisted of brown/husked rice. Today, that share has dropped to 50%, with milled rice making up the rest.
Shipments from India and Pakistan have increased fivefold since 2004–05, while exports from Thailand and Vietnam remain unchanged—suggesting these two Southeast Asian economies may face less disruption.
Despite ongoing FTA talks, Brussels has internally stated it will not extend any concessions to India in the rice sector, calling rice a “highly sensitive product.”
Markets in Europe Are Not Suffering—Demand Is Rising
Markets for rice in the EU are actually expanding due to demographic changes. Although European rice production has dropped only 10% since 2004 and cultivation area remains unchanged at 400,000 hectares, demand has soared—fueled largely by rising immigration.
Markets therefore do not appear threatened by imports; rather, lobbying groups are seeking stronger protection to maintain price control and market share.
Exports Could Shift Processing Power to Europe
Exports from Asia may face a new challenge: pressure to export only paddy rice.
Exports of paddy could force Asian companies to set up processing mills within Europe, similar to one firm that recently established a mill in the Netherlands. This trend would not only reduce value addition in exporting countries but also shift jobs and processing capacity to Europe.
Conclusion
Asian rice-exporting countries—especially India—must keep a close eye on the EU’s internal policy moves. As FTAs progress, it is crucial that India does not concede ground in sectors where the EU is clearly prioritizing its domestic industry. Strategic negotiation, vigilant monitoring, and diversified market planning will be key to protecting long-term export competitiveness.